tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post3057354023581553423..comments2023-10-30T01:46:52.730-06:00Comments on hit the post: game 1 postgame: answerswalkinvisiblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-47844063172478954812009-04-18T13:16:00.000-06:002009-04-18T13:16:00.000-06:00Thanks WI. You're quite the hockey thinker yoursel...Thanks WI. You're quite the hockey thinker yourself. :)R Onoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-28137974878886946542009-04-18T11:50:00.000-06:002009-04-18T11:50:00.000-06:00yes you did.
and that's the only thing about it th...yes you did.<br />and that's the only thing about it that makes me smile...<br /><br />i'm very optimistic that he'll sit tonight. BUT i know that realistically it means if sarich is back then pardy will sit.<br /><br />i hate this team.walkinvisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-1362372120005162342009-04-18T11:45:00.000-06:002009-04-18T11:45:00.000-06:002. why the hell is anders eriksson being considere...<I>2. why the hell is anders eriksson being considered a top 4 defender ?</I>I called it!duncanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16433163316485435724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-9281353123343486502009-04-18T02:28:00.000-06:002009-04-18T02:28:00.000-06:00RO:
i really like you, man. you have some good bra...RO:<br />i really like you, man. you have some good brains.<br /><br />sincerely, <br />WIwalkinvisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-84024347690890232482009-04-17T21:37:00.000-06:002009-04-17T21:37:00.000-06:00WI:
You know the prospects better than I, but I d...WI:<br /><br />You know the prospects better than I, but I don't think Pelech will be ready for the Flames next year. Or, more specifically, I don't think the Flames will be ready for Pelech, as Gio and Pardy will stlll be kinda green and one of them will probably need to be on the bottom pairing. That would be an extremely exploitable pairing if another rookie D were on it (not that it's much better now). Year after next, I am all over Pelech on the team.<br /><br />(Although, if Pelech usurps Vandermeer and forces him to the minors... well hey, trade a bottom-pairing D for a bottom-pairing D and save $1.5M? I'm all over that too!)<br /><br />Don't worry about Warrener and Eriksson. I don't think even Sutter's loyalty will extend to a guy on LTIR all year and a guy who played in the AHL all year.<br /><br />At this point, I don't even wanna know what Sutter is thinking about the forwards. The possibilities are too frightening.<br /><br />Canucks just scored a goal on what I thought could have been a potential high stick. Why won't those bastards just die?<br /><br />(figuratively of course)R Onoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-36312006211848057762009-04-17T17:41:00.000-06:002009-04-17T17:41:00.000-06:00Flames have options on who can be traded to keep h...<I>Flames have options on who can be traded to keep him (ie Langkow, Jokinen, sarich maybe?)</I>.<br /><br />1. darryl sutter will absolutely NOT trade jokinen on this contract. it would be an admission of fault and/or failure with what he gave up (most importantly the first rounder, here). i would be willing to wager pretty much anything on this.<br /><br />2. langkow is the only elite centreman on the team. trading him would be a terrible idea (which is why it's totally possible that he'll go).<br /><br />3. with the presumed loss of aucoin in the summer and the departure of (fingers crossed.... oh god please don't re-sign) warrener, eriksson and leopold, cory sarich becomes necessary on the blueline. gio-dion, sarich-regehr, pardy-palin/pelech. aulie and negrin are also in the wings but probably need a year or two in the A.<br /><br />if we re-sign leopold, sarich becomes expendable.walkinvisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-87014228178143032222009-04-17T17:23:00.000-06:002009-04-17T17:23:00.000-06:00Those are all great signs too. Yes he could go get...Those are all great signs too. Yes he could go get 6+ mill from teams like Atlanta, Toronto, etc. and teams that arent likely to make the playoffs but his joy is both fun to watch and encouraging to think he will see something is more important than money. Flames have options on who can be traded to keep him (ie Langkow, Jokinen, sarich maybe?)Brent G.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-37488168764139836622009-04-17T16:54:00.000-06:002009-04-17T16:54:00.000-06:00and a couple of minutes after he scored he was pra...and a couple of minutes after he scored he was practically vibrating on the bench grinning like a 4-yr old who had just consumed his parents stash of liquor-filled chocolatesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-77994231352071440502009-04-17T16:45:00.000-06:002009-04-17T16:45:00.000-06:00during the anthems, cammo looked positively... wel...during the anthems, cammo looked positively... well... <I>happy</I>. did anyone else notice this ? he was like... i dunno... <I>giddy</I>.<br /><br />maybe he was already thinking "i'm gonna knock that guy in the head and show everyone you don't have to have a BIG BODY to have a PRESENCE."walkinvisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-61680015481894729212009-04-17T16:33:00.000-06:002009-04-17T16:33:00.000-06:00If this doesn't cement Cammalleri's status as a fu...If this doesn't cement Cammalleri's status as a future and long-term Flame, I don't know what will :)R Onoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-38187421534329596492009-04-17T16:30:00.000-06:002009-04-17T16:30:00.000-06:00I laughed I dont know about you guys.
i totally l...<I>I laughed I dont know about you guys</I>.<br /><br />i totally laughed which is why in my post i wrote "kinda funny and totally out of character."walkinvisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-16783345661778908872009-04-17T15:31:00.000-06:002009-04-17T15:31:00.000-06:00to be honest the amount of crap Cammalleri is gett...to be honest the amount of crap Cammalleri is getting for this hit to Havlats head I have to admit I kinda like it. Havlats that whiney little bitch and its about time someone got him to shut up. Ive always thought the flames should play this series like the Broad street bullies. If it means taking a couple penalties here or there it doesnt mean too much; they were excellent at killing them last night. I hope they up the intensity even more in the next game. It sounds dirty and I know that but I wanna see Sarich (who should be back) absolutely lay out Havlat. Like Stupid lay out. Take him off the ice on a stretcher hits. Hes not Marleau and wont get up after a similar hit I all but guarantee it. If thats what it takes to win who cares? There will be no asterick on the cup to specify as such.<br /><br />I laughed I dont know about you guys. I guess im more for the old school hockey where every hit theres atleast a tiny intent to injure. Also if all these teams wanna keep hitting kipper why are we not hitting Habby back? They wont go near him, its no surprise hes making all of the saves.Brent G.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-30550786760995892712009-04-17T14:46:00.000-06:002009-04-17T14:46:00.000-06:00okay well NOW it's all funny.
when i first read ...okay well NOW it's all funny. <br /><br />when i first read your comment (and wondered, i might add, who stephen walkom was but clearly not enough to look it up) i was like "what's wrong with RO ??? he seems out of character..."<br /><br />perhaps we can chalk up my obliviousness to sarcasm and total lack of joke-awareness to the fact that when the flames shit the proverbial bed last night, i boozed myself to sleep...<br /><br />true...<br />;)walkinvisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-78892736946660470162009-04-17T14:09:00.000-06:002009-04-17T14:09:00.000-06:00I am totally kidding earlier WI :) Furlatt was, is...I am totally kidding earlier WI :) Furlatt was, is and will continue to be completely inept at his chosen profession.<br /><br /><I>some might say the glenX non-goal was also a "ballsy call.</I><BR>"Some" being Stephen Walkom, head of league officiating.R Onoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-80767247722170538292009-04-17T13:57:00.000-06:002009-04-17T13:57:00.000-06:00some might say the glenX non-goal was also a "ball...some might say the glenX non-goal was also a "ballsy call." others (myself included) call it incorrect... as for last night, i will recognize that in the moment at the very least, it looked like leopold might have contributed to the interference, but i will disagree completely that playoff hockey v. regular season hockey should be called differently.<br /><br />i don't know about you but i look forward to further ballsy calls at the hands of furlatt, all of which seem to go against the flames.walkinvisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5853674483927136845.post-20870328892870709822009-04-17T13:13:00.000-06:002009-04-17T13:13:00.000-06:00WI, I completely support Furlatt. Playoff hockey i...WI, I completely support Furlatt. Playoff hockey is an entirely different beast - regular season precedents are meaningless when it comes to making game-changing calls. It was a ballsy call, and it was the right call.Fake Stephen Walkom (aka R O)noreply@blogger.com